An incident on the Rock Island Trail that runs along Highway 24 between Peyton and Falcon, Colorado, prompted this missive. A woman had her medium-small dog on the trail, without having him in a leash as required by the law. The dog charged directly at me while I was riding my mountain bike, forcing me to stop suddenly to avoid hitting the dog. The look on her face while she debated what to do as her dog ignored her commands and kept coming at me was priceless in what it revealed. She was more concerned for the safety of her stupid, uncontrollable dog than she was that I might be injured if her stupid, untrained dog ran in front of my bike.
Yes, I'm concerned about being injured by somebody's dog on a public trail. I'm not a young person. I'm only a few months shy of entering my seventh decade. My balance is not as sure as it was in my youth, and my bones and muscles are not as strong. I fall more easily, and preventing a fall is far more precarious than it used to be, partly because I am overweight. I injure more easily, and the injuries are less likely to heal. Yet, I work at maintaining my fitness, and I have a right to the safe use of the public trails. But dog people prevent my safe use of the trails in El Paso County, Colorado over and over.
I yelled at her that her dog belonged on a leash. She ignored me and was unable to catch her dog until after I had stopped. I met her again on our respective return trips on this trail. Her dog was now on a leash, but her dog slipped the collar. The leash was only for show. My exercise companion told me he had also had to yell at her to leash her dog when it ran in front of his bike further up the trail. This woman was obviously a selfish, rude "dog person."
This brings to mind when I lived in Germany for three years. There were a lot of dogs in public. Dogs in stores staying close to their owners and not bothering anyone, dogs sitting quietly outside restaurants, dogs on all the hiking trails and sidewalks. All these dogs were well-behaved. None of those dogs ever intruded into anyone's space, or even paid any attention to others. Obviously, the problem isn't the dogs. It's their owners. A dog is a problem when its owner is a "dog person."
A Dog Person Likes Dogs Better Than People
A dog owner is not necessarily a dog person, but a dog person is easy to spot. They are usually very vocal about how much more they likeBut liking dogs better than people is just a shitty excuse for bad behavior. Dogs don't point it out when their person is being a jerk. They're not smart enough to know better. It's safer for unrepentant jerks to like dogs better than the assholes who think you're a jerk, because, naturally, the dog person isn't a jerk in his or her own mind and they don't see any reason to reform their jerkhood. It's everyone else who is a jerk. Except, of course, other dog people. Other dog people think it's cute that dog people are jerks to other people.
The Rules and Laws Don't Apply to a Dog Person
A dog person doesn't believe the rules about dogs apply to them. Actually, they are probably jerks who don't think any rules apply to them, but they especially flaunt the rules about dogs. They remain oblivious to the fact that the only reason parks, municipalities and other organizations had to make rules about dogs is because of the rudeness of dog people and their collective refusal to be a responsible dog owner.It's dog people who let their dogs bark and annoy everyone around, or run loose and intrude upon the space of others who are minding their own business, or poop in parks and on sidewalks, or worry and kill wildlife and livestock, or engage in other dog-specific unsocial behaviors that can and should be controlled by the owner. Dog people even move into the country specifically so their dogs can run free all over all the neighboring properties. So laws and rules had to be passed to ensure dog people suffer unpleasant consequences when their dogs infringe on the rights and property of others who are also members of society. Predictably, the rules don't work, because -- big surprise -- dog people don't think the rules apply to them and their wonderful dog.
Take our local trails in El Paso County, Colorado. All of them are clearly posted that dogs must be on a leash, a requirement which is universally ignored by the privileged dog people. Disregarding the obvious fact that everyone has the right to the safe and unmolested use of those trails, dog people have exercised a tyranny over those trails and parts by not leashing their dogs. This tyranny forces others to either forgo using the trails or to confront the dog people who defy the rules and law. Gone is the peaceful right to use public lands, unless you are a dog person, because use of those trails is fraught with conflict and risk of injury due to the selfish conduct of dog people.
One man on the Section 16 Trail in Black Forest constantly brings his huge, placid yellow lab on his walks. This dog is never on a leash, and never under the voice control of his master. This is a difficult trail, with steep inclines, tree roots across the trail and other obstacles that must be navigated. There are often young children on this trail, as well as elderly people. Adding a dog as an obstacle endangers the public safety, besides being an unwelcome annoyance. I've seen this dog meander through a pack of high school students running on this difficult trail, nearly tripping several of the running youths.
On this occasion, I was running, too, not nearly as fast or sure-footed as these young people, and in the opposite direction. This damned dog meandered right in front of me and nearly tripped me, too. The old man did nothing; in fact, the old fart was oblivious to the danger his dog presented to a late-middle-aged woman on a public trail. I had to alter my pace and direction to avoid being tripped by this dog, but I'm not nimble enough to do it effectively. I stopped and yelled at him to put his dog on a leash. He said, "Look at him, he's not going to hurt anyone!" The dumb ass couldn't even see that his big, dumb dog had already almost hurt me. Or, more likely, this dumb ass didn't give a damn that his big, dumb dog had almost hurt me.
The dog kept approaching me, even when I backed away. The man called him back, and the dog ignored him. He argued with me about how friendly his dog was, couldn't I see that? It soon became clear that this dog was not under voice control, besides not being on a leash, and was not going to be prevented from continuing to come right up to me. The man made no move to retrieve his advancing dog. So I took out my pepper spray and sprayed the dog's eyes, who finally backed away.
The old fart dog owner called me a "fucking bitch." I'm the f-bitch? Like a typical dog person, if the dog is not under control of the owner and you have to use some force to repel the unwanted advances of their dog, a dog person will claim you are the bad guy for resolving the matter according to your needs because he failed to. You are supposed to joyfully endure the unwanted attention of their uncontrolled dog. Too bad if you don't want and never encouraged the dog's advances. I never want or encourage a dog to approach me or get friendly with me, but they always do.
You see, I don't know anything about other people's dogs. I cannot assume their dog is safe, or won't bite, or won't jump on me or knock me over, or do anything else untoward. They have teeth, they can run and jump, and they exert their own will. Besides the obvious biting risk, they can knock me over or trip me, injuring me. Oh, and for the record, I have history with a so-called safe dog.
My son was mauled by a dog whom the owners assured everyone was safe, and my son's eye was scarred for life. This was the second time that dog attacked my son, the first time was in my own yard -- the dog was running loose and out of control of his owner -- and the dog tore my son's shirt while attempting to bite him. The dog owner's kids later enticed my son back to their yard to prove the dog was safe and, despite my prohibition, my son approached the dog. The owner's kids then provoked the dog who responded by biting my son in the face. The mother -- a dog person who cared more about her dog than her dog's vicious bite to my child's face -- detained my 10-year-old son for over 45 minutes, placed an unsanitary wet washcloth on the dog bites, and tried to convince my son tell a lie about which dog bit him, delaying needed emergency medical treatment and plastic surgery. Naturally, I don't believe it when someone says their dog won't hurt anyone. No prudent person would.
Leashing dog AFTER it got aggressive |
But for those who think violating the rules pertaining to dogs is essentially harmless, consider this: A passenger on a commercial airline had previously checked and been assured that there were no dogs in the cabin on this flight. Another passenger, a dog person, smuggled her dog into the cabin of that flight, obviously to avoid paying for the fare (lying, cheating and stealing from the airline). Shortly after taking off, the first passenger began having a life-threatening allergic reaction to the dog. A search uncovered the dog in the cabin. Is it harmless that a flight must be diverted because a dog person acted on the belief that the rules did not apply to her and another passenger's life was endangered? There are legitimate reasons for rules and laws pertaining to dogs, and any reasonable and responsible person will voluntarily cooperate with those rules because its best for everyone, even if it inconveniences them a bit. After all, the privilege of dog ownership comes with responsibilities.
Dog People Don't Train Their Dogs
A dog person does not train their dog to behave. Their dogs will not obey any commands. But usually, dog people don't issue commands, they converse with their dog and expect the dog to understand. One friend of a family member brings her dog over to my property when she visits my family member. The first time she did, she let her dog out of the car to run loose. WTF? The dog promptly charged my young turkeys and chased my free-range chickens. I was screaming at her that she cannot bring her damned dog over to my property and let him run loose like that. Turkeys are expensive, fragile and easily injured, and this dog was in attack mode. She called him ever so nicely, but he ignored her. Ultimately, she was upset that I yelled at her. She didn't care what her dog had done to MY turkeys and chickens on MY property. She didn't care that she had no control over her own dog who was only doing what an untrained dog does. I was the bad guy because I expected her to control her dog on my property and got mad when she didn't. I was wrong for screaming at her. She doesn't even realize how close I came to shooting her dog, and that she should consider herself lucky I only yelled at her.Source: http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/articles/jumpingdogs.htm |
I was riding my mountain bike on Section 16 Trail, and a dog who was not on a leash chased me, crossed in front of my bike and made me crash. At my age! And broke my bike. And then the dog person wanted to make it right. She had tried calling him off to no avail and felt bad about my accident. I was pissed and bleeding and trying to fix my bike. I just yelled at her. Put your damned dog on a leash, asshole! That would have prevented the accident. The accident was unnecessary and preventable, but leashing her dog was too inconvenient for the dog person.
One man's large dog charged me and jumped on me at Section 16 trail. Dog people think
Source: http://www.dogbreedinfo.com/articles/jumpingdogs.htm |
It doesn't matter whose dog it is, they all do what dogs do, they want to investigate everyone and try to assert dominance over anyone they encounter. But that unrestrained proclivity seriously interferes with what I'm doing on these trails and is a danger. I'm working here, exercising on a public trail, and you rude dog people and your dogs are ruining it because you insist your dogs should not be leashed and you won't train them to be under your voice control. They won't even stop and hold their unleashed dog as I approach. Dog people selfishly believe I should adapt my conduct to their dog rather than obeying the rules and putting their dog on a leash. I don't want to stop my walk, or run, or cycling to deal with dogs who charge at me, and I shouldn't have to. Trust me, if I have to stop my workout to deal with it, the dog people won't like how I deal with it.
A Dog Person Doesn't Care That Their Failure to Control Their Dog Adversely Affects Others
A dog person doesn't care that they are causing you stress or upsetting you or causing property damage with their thoughtless, rude, and irresponsible dog behavior. They LOVE their dog, and they think their dog is cute, or their best friend or wonderful. Good for them. But they expect everyone else to think the same thing about their dog, and if you don't, you're a jerk. What a remarkably self-absorbed attitude! Why would any reasonable person think an untrained, undisciplined dog is anything but annoying, if not dangerous? And let's face it, victims of a dog person's self-absorbed rudeness are likely to project their anger toward you onto their stupid dog, too. And it's really not the dog's fault, it's the owner's fault.Look, it's just better if dog people were to assume that others don't want to be friends with your dog, and don't want to pet your dog, and don't want your dog licking them or jumping on them. That they don't want your dogs to interrupt their workout, because, frankly, I don't want any of this. I'm not interfering with your use of that trail, why do you think it's okay of you interfere with my workout by letting your dog run into me, jump on me or trip me? I don't let my dogs do it, why should I let your stupid dog do it?
My dogs are always trained and follow my commands. Immediately. That takes consistent work and patience, something that most dog people are too lazy to employ. I don't like untrained dogs, but I don't blame the dog. I blame the selfish, lazy owner. They don't care enough about their dogs to ensure they are behaved in society and don't encroach on the personal space of others or infringe the rights of others, and then irrationally blame the victim of their dog's unwanted attention when their dog gets pepper sprayed on a public trail or get shot for killing chickens. Yes, the inference is I shoot dogs, and I admit it. If your dog is on my property chasing my poultry, I shoot it. If you don't like that idea, keep your dog on your property. The sheriff has fully supported every shooting, because we report every shooting of someone's dog.
A Dog Person Forces Their Dog on Everyone Else
A dog person will take their dog with them wherever they go, and forces the public to embrace their dog. Little dogs, medium dogs, big dogs, they expect everyone to treat them like they had the same rights as a person, without the responsibilities.One mentally disabled homeless man named Billy in the Los Angeles area defiantly takes
Sample of Billy's Facebook posts |
Billy and Brownie |
been beaten, how much longer will it be before he loses Brownie just because his so-called friends incite him to disobey the law? He doesn't understand what he's doing, he's just doing what others tell him to do.
But non-disabled people do the same thing. While you have to endure dogs in the big-box pet stores that welcome pets, grocery stores, department stores, libraries and other other public places exclude dogs. Yet, you see people there with the dogs, especially little dogs. These dog people treat their dogs as if they were their children, placing them in the child seat in the cart. Or their dog is a fashion accessory; obvious because they flaunt flamboyant outfits, makeup and accessories, complete with their adorned dog. They say he's a little dog, he's not hurting anyone. They disregard the fact that besides breaking the law, they are intruding on the rights of all other patrons of that store. Not everyone likes your stupid little dog and he makes some people very uncomfortable or poses a risk to their health.
Fake service dog card offered online for a fee |
If you visit a dog person, they force you to endure their dog jumping on you, licking you,
putting its head in your crotch, barking at you, slobbering on you and your belongings, pawing you, and tripping you, blah blah blah. They even post memes about it, like "My dog lives here, you don't. If you don't like it, you can leave." I'll accept that invitation, because a dog person's priorities are screwed up.
They think dogs are more important than people, which is one of the things that makes dog people such jerks. They won't let you punish their dog for jumping on you or anything else when they won't stop the dog themselves. They let the dog bark and annoy the neighbors. They treat other people like their dog is more important than the person. It's a dog, an animal, property. When dog people treat other people as less important than property, it's no wonder reasonable people think dog people are such jerks.
I have a friend who has a big dog. Her dog is friendly and eager to engage me when I visit. I don't want to engage with the dog. I want to visit with my friend. She doesn't have that asinine "love me, love my dog" mentality. She puts him outside and we have a nice visit without me having to fawn over her dog. I love her, I don't love her dog and won't love her dog in order to be her friend. And, not being a dog person, she won't force me to love her dog in order to love her and be her friend. That's one of the qualities that makes her a likable person, she cares about her friend's comfort in her home.
What's the Big Deal?
Dog people and others ask, "The dog isn't causing a problem. Why does this --not being on a leash or taking it into public places, etc. -- upset you?" This is a false premise.The dog is causing a problem whenever anyone's rights are infringed by this flagrant and selfish violation of the law or rules. Never mind the disgusting habit of your dog pooping where I live, the mere act of trespassing to any degree is a violation of my rights. Why should I have to endure it or be forced to sue the owner? Why can't I just peacefully enjoy my property?
Why can't I use the public trails and parks without suffering the intrusion of a dog into my space and interfering with my business, without being molested by a dog jumping on me, or tripping me, or getting aggressive toward me? My right to the peaceful and safe use of public lands supersedes the dog's right to jump on me, or the dog person's rights to take his dog into public. That's not just the law, that's common courtesy, something that every dog person lacks.
Why are there rules and laws about taking dogs in public places? Because dogs are unpredictable, especially dogs owned by dog people. Because many dogs are untrained, because their owners are irresponsible and selfish. People who often insist the dog rules don't apply to them are the very ones who cannot control their dog and will not put in the effort to train them.
It's a public safety issue, not only because of the risk of attacks against people or animals, but because uncontrolled dogs can cause other accidents and injury and damage. What happens when the dog gets aggressive or disruptive in a public place? Can anyone guarantee that their pet dog will not attack anyone, especially someone who won't back down and confronts the dog owner verbally? It's easy to make a dog person's dog get aggressive, just argue with the dog owner and see what the dog does. The dog's aggression is a natural response to a perceived threat, especially in an untrained, uncontrolled dog. This is a serious risk to public safety. Even tripping an elderly person, or harming a child by knocking him over is enough of a risk to warrant compliance with the dog laws and rules.
It's obviously a health issue, especially in places with food. Maybe dog people don't care if their dog begs at the table or messes with stuff in their kitchen, but I do. I won't accept dinner invitations to their homes, I find it disgusting, even revolting. Dog people don't have a right to impose their bad dog practices on the public, especially where there is a real health issue. They may let their
But more than that, it's an issue of respect for others and respect for the law and the rules. Nobody knows about another person's dog experiences, yet dog people impose their dogs on everyone else, even those who have had bad experiences with dogs, including mauling. They don't know about allergies, and frankly, they don't care. They don't respect anyone's dog boundaries. This disrespects the rights and needs of everyone else. What kind of jerk forces a traumatized person to endure their dog just because the dog person likes dogs better than people and takes their dogs in prohibited public places or without a leash? Or induces allergic reactions in allergic bystanders by taking their dog to prohibited public places? Or makes a patron so disgusted by the presence of a dog around food that he or she cannot buy or eat where the dog was? To put it mildly, only an uncaring, selfish jerk would impose this on others.
I can only conclude that dog people who don't follow leash laws in our parks and trails know they offend others and intend to make others uncomfortable, or intend to endanger their safety, or to intimidate them. They intend to force other users of the public parks and trails to stop using the trails or to put up with the free-ranging dogs that trip them or charge at them. That makes the dog person a selfish jerk.
Those who take their companion dog into public places citing that it is a service dog are daring others to say something, knowing you won't, that you'll endure their rudeness and disrespect in silence. But if you do speak out, they thrive on the conflict. This provocation is not fair to the others who frequent those places desiring peaceful society in public. But they don't care about fair, they only care about themselves. They don't voluntarily cooperate with the rules and laws established, causing disruption in the orderly and peaceful functioning of society. They provoke their favor for disorder by their defiance of the laws and the rules. This infringes the rights of others to peaceful participation in all aspects of society. I've had enough.
I won't stop using the trails. I can't rely on law enforcement, so I will resort to self-help. I am now armed with pepper spray and a heavy stick. I use them whenever any dog is close enough. Not once has the dog owner filed charges against me. They cannot. Their dog was aggressive, not under the voice control or any other control of the dog owner, and was not on a leash. But their dogs generally end up requiring veterinary treatment, which is a shame for the dumb dog but a legitimately expensive consequence for the self-absorbed dog person.
I have other remedies in mind depending on the situation. But I am no longer going to be intimidated into silence or into forgoing my rightful and peaceful use of the public trails or other public places. I will be free from the intimidation and intrusions of dog people and their dogs. I changed the practice in my neighborhood of dogs running free by shooting the dogs that came onto my property to kill my poultry, and by suing the dog people for trespass and winning. Now, dogs no longer run free anywhere near my property. I can similarly change the practice of unleashed dogs on the public trails that I want to use.
Here's my notice to you dog people. If you love your dog as much as you claim, you will make sure your dog does not infringe on my rights, my personal space, or my property, or my peaceful use of the public trails and parks. If you do infringe, don't think I will waste my time trying to reason with you, because none of you have proven to be reasonable. I will communicate in the only language you seem to understand, and I'm quite sure you won't like it any more than I like you forcing your dog's intrusions on me.
No comments:
Post a Comment